DISKD Information

whyrus · Post by **whyrus** » Thu Nov 09, 2006 11:43 pm

Dear Friends ,
I want to know whats the benefit of DISKD command
as i heard it boost cache hits. is that true then how can i apply this
i,m already using ufs file system on cache drive can i change it during
work ? if not then how can i change it .kindly reply me if anyone knows
abt it ..
thank you very much
Allah Hafiz

Saad Khan · Post by **Saad Khan** » Fri Nov 10, 2006 10:40 am

check out following link
http://wiki.squid-cache.org/SquidFaq/DiskDaemon

whyrus · Post by **whyrus** » Fri Nov 10, 2006 1:14 pm

Asalam u Alikum
Thank you saad bhai i have done it and i found good change in my
cache hits. it seems very good yet .. your posted links give me good
details about my question.
thanks once again
take care
Allah Bless u

newbie · Post by **newbie** » Tue Nov 28, 2006 6:05 am

yes you can change from ufs to diskd.
It works best on only FreeBSD not for linux.
For linux aufs is best.

Post by **lambda** » Tue Nov 28, 2006 10:31 am

newbie wrote:It works better on only FreeBSD not for linux.

where did you read that?

kbukhari · Post by **kbukhari** » Tue Nov 28, 2006 12:36 pm

lambda wrote:
newbie wrote:It works better on only FreeBSD not for linux.
where did you read that?

diskd works better on freebsd read this and dont ask me who is hanrik

Post by **lambda** » Tue Nov 28, 2006 12:44 pm

nbukhaki wrote:diskd works better on freebsd read this and dont ask me who is hanrik

it says diskd works on freebsd and linux, but aufs provides better performance on linux. it does not say that diskd does not perform better than ufs on linux, which is what newbie said.

please do something about your reading comprehension problem.

kbukhari · Post by **kbukhari** » Tue Nov 28, 2006 1:03 pm

lambda wrote:
nbukhaki wrote:diskd works better on freebsd read this and dont ask me who is hanrik
it says diskd works on freebsd and linux, but aufs provides better performance on linux. it does not say that diskd does not perform better than ufs on linux, which is what newbie said.

please do something about your reading comprehension problem.

ok fine tank a look on
n 31.05 14:11, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> aufs on Linux, diskd on *BSD.

Post by **lambda** » Tue Nov 28, 2006 1:33 pm

pnukhri wrote:ok fine tank a look on
n 31.05 14:11, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> aufs on Linux, diskd on *BSD.

let me put it in another form:

Code: Select all

henrik says

os       performance
linux    aufs > diskd > ufs
*bsd     diskd > ufs

newbie says

os       performance
linux    aufs > ufs > diskd
*bsd     diskd > ufs

now, you keep pasting stuff about henrik and his "aufs of linux, diskd on *bsd", but nowhere does henrik say that diskd is a bad idea on linux, which is what newbie said.

kbukhari · Post by **kbukhari** » Tue Nov 28, 2006 3:14 pm

did i ask you to replay me >?

i would like you to remind that same thing you said when u cam to xess for confiruration squid on freebsd and you used diskd
dont you ?
Mr fareed

Post by **lambda** » Tue Nov 28, 2006 3:26 pm

rlikheri wrote:did i ask you to replay me >?

by clearly missing the point (repeatedly), yes, you invited a response. whether or not you wanted one is irrelevant.

no one, not a single person has claimed that aufs is a bad idea. no one has claimed that people should use diskd on linux. and yet, you posted twice about aufs on linux and diskd on freebsd. this isn't about whether diskd is better than ufs, this is about newbie's claim that diskd is not better than ufs on linux. i've said that at least twice now. is that really so difficult to understand?

i would like you to remind that same thing you said when u cam to xess for confiruration squid on freebsd and you used diskd
dont you ?

please remind me. what did i say about diskd five years ago?

Mr fareed

perhaps you meant someone else? that's not my name.

kbukhari · Post by **kbukhari** » Tue Nov 28, 2006 3:44 pm

lambda wrote:
Mr fareed
perhaps you meant someone else? that's not my name.

IF AM NOT WRONG YOU ARE FAREED NAWAZ
who cam to xess net for configuration squid onfreebsd and you were clamming that diskd is good for freebsd
you are talking about 5 year ago i was in 10th that time

Post by **lambda** » Tue Nov 28, 2006 4:00 pm

mluphazi wrote:IF AM NOT WRONG YOU ARE FAREED NAWAZ

you are mistaken.

who cam to xess net for configuration squid onfreebsd and you were clamming that diskd is good for freebsd

really? i claimed that diskd was better on freebsd 4.x than on redhat 7.2 or whatever people used at the time? are you sure i didn't say freebsd 4.x was better for network servers than linux at the time?

either way, that does not change the fact that newbie claims that diskd is worse than ufs on linux.

you are talking about 5 year ago i was in 10th that time

how is that in any way relevant?

kbukhari · Post by **kbukhari** » Tue Nov 28, 2006 4:29 pm

i know u will do such thing 'mluphazi wrote'
cheap people will do cheap things

and i am not wrong you are fareed nawaz

and you know me personaly

Asim Bukhari is my cousin

Post by **lambda** » Tue Nov 28, 2006 4:57 pm

crywaahy wrote:i know u will do such thing 'mluphazi wrote'
cheap people will do cheap things

funny, for someone who goes around misspelling "henrik" and other names, you sure are upset when someone misspells yours.

and i am not wrong you are fareed nawaz

for the last time, that is not my name. all it takes is one click on the right link(s) on this page to tell you that.

and you know me personaly Asim Bukhari is my cousin

i have no idea who asim bukhari is.

linuxpakistan.net

DISKD Information

DISKD Information

Thank You Saad Bhai